A PLOS Biology analysis finds papers led by women spend 7%-15% longer in peer review, a delay that can undermine promotion, funding, and career advancement for clinician-researchers.

The arrival of AI-generated research papers marks a turning point that could radically accelerate discovery—or drown it in ...

James Zou is a computer scientist at Stanford University who has been exploring how large language models (LLMs) can assist ...

AI Scientist, an autonomous research tool, first released in 2024, has now undergone peer review, highlighting its strengths ...

An autonomous AI system has written a scientific paper from scratch and cleared the first round of peer review at a workshop for the International Conference on Learning Representations, one of the ...

Peer-reviewed research is the gold standard for science. We rely on that system to weed out the discoveries from the detritus. However, growing concerns over how the peer-review system operates are ...

The following types of contribution to Nature Portfolio journals are peer-reviewed: Articles, Letters, Brief Communications, Matters Arising, Technical Reports, Analysis, Resources, Reviews, ...

Cone Health is a North Carolina-based nonprofit health system serving patients across 150 locations, including five hospitals and more than 120 physician practices. It had a peer review paper-based ...

A recent article published in Nature highlights the overwhelming number of peer-reviewed research papers that were retracted in 2023. To some, this may appear to be a reason for concern with how ...

This essay is excerpted from a new Chronicle special report, “Building a Faculty that Flourishes,” available in the Chronicle Store. Mention peer review of teaching in a faculty meeting, and you’re ...

What is peer review of teaching (PRT)? Peer review is recognized in academia as a measure for ensuring quality work that meets standards and expectations among experts. Similarly, peer review of ...